Compass Investments

Tornado Cash is reported to have circulated approximately $2.5 billion in 2025, indicating a continued interest in privacy-focused cryptocurrency instruments.

Restrictions on Tornado Cash were lifted after a federal court ruled that immutable smart contracts do not fall under the definition of property under U.S. law.

regulators and market participants face the increasing challenge of finding a balance between encouraging privacy innovation and curbing its misuse as cryptocurrency adoption gains momentum.

According to Bitrace, cryptomixer Tornado Cash has processed about $2.5 billion worth of Ethereum tokens in 2025. And this happened despite the privacy platform being under a regulatory ban until March 2025.

evertheless, activity on the asset-mixing service did not stop either before or after the restrictions were imposed.

In 2022, Tornado Cash was heavily sanctioned by a number of Western countries, including the U.S., which imposed restrictions on the transaction hiding platform that allows users to mask transactions and make them harder to track.

What has been the reaction of regulatory authorities to Tornado Cash’s actions?

The U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control said Tornado Cash facilitated the laundering of more than $7 billion, including $455 million stolen by North Korean group Lazarus, and subsequently prosecuted the company’s founders, who are still involved in litigation.

One of the founders, Alexey Pertsev, has already been sentenced to 64 months in prison. According to Cryptopolitan, another co-founder, Roman Shtorm, is awaiting a verdict, while a third co-founder is currently at large.

The sanctions imposed on the platform led to a drop in activity, but transactions continued thanks to the decentralized structure of Tornado Cash. Since then, the protocol has become widely recognized as a tool for those seeking to hide transactions for legitimate privacy reasons, as well as for malicious actors looking to launder funds.

What is the technology behind this privacy revolution?

The technological basis for privacy protocols is zero-knowledge proof (ZKP), a cryptographic technique that allows the existence of information to be confirmed without revealing the data itself.

The method was first proposed by researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1985, and since then ZKP has evolved from a theoretical concept to a practical framework that has enabled billions of transactions.

In Tornado Cash’s mechanism of operation, users deposit cryptocurrency into smart contracts that aggregate funds from various sources. When withdrawing funds to a new address, users provide zero-disclosure evidence to prove their entitlement to the funds, but do not disclose from which deposit the withdrawal was made.

This makes it extremely difficult for outside observers to trace the movement of assets, effectively interrupting the transparent audit trail that characterizes most blockchain transactions.

The ecosystem of privacy protocols has expanded beyond Tornado Cash as well. According to Bitrace, net inflows into Railgun, a platform often cited by Vitalik Buterin, totaled $1.4 billion in 2025.

Institutional market participants have made significant investments in privacy solutions in 2025, with the majority of these funds going into Zcash. This cryptocurrency, built on the same code as Bitcoin but with an added layer of privacy, has caught the attention of users looking for more privacy in their transactions.

Since then, the Zcash token has appreciated more than 750% in a year, and its market capitalization has surpassed $6.45 billion.

Another privacy platform, Monero, has also received significant investment, with a market value now exceeding $9.1 billion. However, these solutions are not cryptomixers, unlike Tornado Cash, which perhaps adds to their appeal.

The restrictions on Tornado Cash were lifted after a federal appeals court ruled that immutable smart contracts do not equate to property under U.S. law, stripping regulators of the power to impose sanctions directly against the software itself.